Lift Foils 150 High Aspect X Front Wing 150 hydrofoil front wing: 968 cm², 991 mm span, aspect ratio 10.10, with its closest equivalents from other brands within ±5% area and ±8% aspect ratio. Figures from Lift Foils's own published specifications.
Projected and flat area run 3–8% apart. A marked area is one whose brand does not state which it publishes, so a match inside the area tolerance may be comparing unlike figures.
| Brand | Wing | Area cm² | Δ area | Aspect ratio | Δ AR | Span mm | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabfoil | Blackbird Razor 977 Blackbird Razor 977 | 953 | -1.5% | 10.20 | +1.0% | 977 | C4 High aspect |
| Naish | Excalibur HA Front Wing Excalibur 944 | 944 | -2.5% | 10.20 | +1.0% | 982 | C4 High aspect |
| Sabfoil | Razor PRO 975 Razor PRO 975 | 942 | -2.7% | 10.20 | +1.0% | 980 | C4 High aspect |
| Armstrong | HA (High Aspect) HA980 | 980 | +1.2% | 9.68 | -4.2% | 974 | C4 High aspect |
| North | Sonar HA950 HA950 | 950 | -1.9% | 10.60 | +5.0% | 1,000 | C4 High aspect |
| Code Foils | S Series Front Wing 980S | 980 | +1.2% | 9.50 | -5.9% | 965 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Axis | Surge Surge 950 | 949 | -2.0% | 9.52 | -5.7% | 950 | C4 High aspect |
| KT Foiling | Atlas 960 Atlas 960 | 960 | -0.8% | 10.80 | +6.9% | 1,020 | C4 High aspect |
| F-One | EAGLE HM Carbon EAGLE 990 | 990 | +2.3% | 9.50 | -5.9% | 970 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Unifoil | Evolution 155 Evolution 155 | 1,000 | +3.3% | 9.40 | -6.9% | 968 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Family | High Aspect X |
|---|---|
| Size | 150 |
| Area, cm² | 968 |
| Area basis | unknown |
| Span, mm | 991 |
| Chord, mm | — |
| Aspect ratio | 10.10 |
| Band | C4 High aspect |
| Brand files it under | Glide / high aspect |
| Disciplines | downwind, prone |
| Construction | HM carbon (Toray M3) |
| Model year | 2026 |
| Source | manufacturer |
The brand's published aspect ratio agrees with its own span and area (span² ÷ area) to within 5%, so the figure is confirmed.
See Lift Foils on the plot →Data current to August 2026. Fast Bobby is the researcher, never the reviewer: every figure above is the manufacturer's published claim, converted to comparable units, and nothing here is a riding impression.