Unifoil Evolution 205 Evolution 205 hydrofoil front wing: 1,323 cm², 1,113 mm span, aspect ratio 9.40, with its closest equivalents from other brands within ±5% area and ±8% aspect ratio. Figures from Unifoil's own published specifications.
Projected and flat area run 3–8% apart. A marked area is one whose brand does not state which it publishes, so a match inside the area tolerance may be comparing unlike figures.
| Brand | Wing | Area cm² | Δ area | Aspect ratio | Δ AR | Span mm | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code Foils | S Series Front Wing 1300S | 1,300 | -1.7% | 9.50 | +1.1% | 1,115 | C3 Mid aspect |
| F-One | EAGLE HM Carbon EAGLE 1290 | 1,290 | -2.5% | 9.50 | +1.1% | 1,105 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Cabrinha | Fusion H-Series MkII H1300 | 1,300 | -1.7% | 9.14 | -2.8% | 1,090 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Slingshot | One-Lock Glide 1325 | 1,325 | +0.2% | 8.90 | -5.3% | 1,099 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Sroka | S-Foil 1350 L HA 1350 L HA | 1,350 | +2.0% | 9.00 | -4.3% | 1,100 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Duotone | Glide 2.0 SLS 1350 | 1,350 | +2.0% | 9.90 | +5.3% | 1,160 | C4 High aspect |
| ENSIS | STRIDE ACE Front Wing 1360 | 1,360 | +2.8% | 8.90 | -5.3% | 1,100 | C3 Mid aspect |
| GONG | Fluid V3 Atmo XXL | 1,310 | -1.0% | 8.70 | -7.4% | 1,070 | C3 Mid aspect |
| GONG | Veloce V3 Atmo XXL | 1,300 | -1.7% | 10.10 | +7.4% | 1,150 | C4 High aspect |
| GONG | Trail V3 Atmo L | 1,350 | +2.0% | 10.10 | +7.4% | 1,170 | C4 High aspect |
| Family | Evolution |
|---|---|
| Size | Evolution 205 |
| Area, cm² | 1,323 |
| Area basis | unknown |
| Span, mm | 1,113 |
| Chord, mm | 138 |
| Aspect ratio | 9.40 |
| Band | C3 Mid aspect |
| Brand files it under | Glide / high aspect |
| Disciplines | prone, wing, downwind, tow |
| Construction | HM carbon |
| Model year | 2026 |
| Source | manufacturer |
The brand's published aspect ratio agrees with its own span and area (span² ÷ area) to within 5%, so the figure is confirmed.
See Unifoil on the plot →Data current to August 2026. Fast Bobby is the researcher, never the reviewer: every figure above is the manufacturer's published claim, converted to comparable units, and nothing here is a riding impression.