Armstrong UHA (Ultra High Aspect) UHA870 hydrofoil front wing: 870 cm², 1,047 mm span, aspect ratio 12.60, with its closest equivalents from other brands within ±5% area and ±8% aspect ratio. Figures from Armstrong's own published specifications.
Projected and flat area run 3–8% apart. A marked area is one whose brand does not state which it publishes, so a match inside the area tolerance may be comparing unlike figures.
| Brand | Wing | Area cm² | Δ area | Aspect ratio | Δ AR | Span mm | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GONG | Veloce Light Wind (LW) V3 Atmo M | 900 | +3.4% | 12.70 | +0.8% | 1,070 | C5 Very high aspect |
| Code Foils | R Series Front Wing 860R | 860 | -1.1% | 13.00 | +3.2% | 1,050 | C5 Very high aspect |
| Axis | Fireball ULTRA Fireball 1070 | 877 | +0.8% | 13.07 | +3.7% | 1,070 | C5 Very high aspect |
| Unifoil | Quest 135 Quest 135 | 870 | +0.0% | 13.40 | +6.3% | 1,078 | C5 Very high aspect |
| North | Sonar DW900 DW900 | 900 | +3.4% | 13.00 | +3.2% | 1,080 | C5 Very high aspect |
| Axis | ART PRO ART PRO 1001 | 845 | -2.9% | 12.06 | -4.3% | 1,001 | C5 Very high aspect |
| F-One | EAGLE X UHM Carbon EAGLE X 900 | 900 | +3.4% | 12.00 | -4.8% | 1,040 | C5 Very high aspect |
| GONG | Veloce HDW V3 M | 900 | +3.4% | 13.30 | +5.6% | 1,090 | C5 Very high aspect |
| Levitaz | Front Wing FS 900 FS 900 | 900 | +3.4% | 13.30 | +5.6% | 1,100 | C5 Very high aspect |
| Lift Foils | Florence 130 X Front Wing 130 | 839 | -3.6% | 11.70 | -7.1% | 991 | C5 Very high aspect |
| Family | UHA |
|---|---|
| Size | UHA870 |
| Area, cm² | 870 |
| Area basis | unknown |
| Span, mm | 1,047 |
| Chord, mm | — |
| Aspect ratio | 12.60 |
| Band | C5 Very high aspect |
| Brand files it under | Glide / high aspect |
| Disciplines | — |
| Construction | carbon |
| Model year | 2026 |
| Source | manufacturer |
The brand's published aspect ratio agrees with its own span and area (span² ÷ area) to within 5%, so the figure is confirmed.
See Armstrong on the plot →Data current to August 2026. Fast Bobby is the researcher, never the reviewer: every figure above is the manufacturer's published claim, converted to comparable units, and nothing here is a riding impression.