KT Foiling Nomad 1160 Nomad 1160 hydrofoil front wing: 1,160 cm², 1,050 mm span, aspect ratio 9.50, with its closest equivalents from other brands within ±5% area and ±8% aspect ratio. Figures from KT Foiling's own published specifications.
Projected and flat area run 3–8% apart. A marked area is one whose brand does not state which it publishes, so a match inside the area tolerance may be comparing unlike figures.
| Brand | Wing | Area cm² | Δ area | Aspect ratio | Δ AR | Span mm | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code Foils | S Series Front Wing 1130S | 1,130 | -2.6% | 9.50 | +0.0% | 1,035 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Armstrong | HA (High Aspect) HA1180 | 1,180 | +1.7% | 9.63 | +1.4% | 1,066 | C4 High aspect |
| Lift Foils | 180 Vario Front Wing 180 | 1,161 | +0.1% | 9.80 | +3.2% | 1,067 | C4 High aspect |
| F-One | EAGLE HM Carbon EAGLE 1190 | 1,190 | +2.6% | 9.40 | -1.1% | 1,060 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Unifoil | Evolution 175 Evolution 175 | 1,129 | -2.7% | 9.40 | -1.1% | 1,028 | C3 Mid aspect |
| AFS | Silk V2 Front Wing Silk 1150 | 1,150 | -0.9% | 9.00 | -5.3% | 1,017 | C3 Mid aspect |
| GONG | Veloce V3 Atmo XL | 1,150 | -0.9% | 10.10 | +6.3% | 1,080 | C4 High aspect |
| Naish | Excalibur HA Front Wing Excalibur 1144 | 1,144 | -1.4% | 10.20 | +7.4% | 1,080 | C4 High aspect |
| Axis | Surge Surge 1080 | 1,142 | -1.6% | 10.22 | +7.6% | 1,080 | C4 High aspect |
| Slingshot | One-Lock Glide 1125 | 1,125 | -3.0% | 8.90 | -6.3% | 999 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Family | Nomad |
|---|---|
| Size | Nomad 1160 |
| Area, cm² | 1,160 |
| Area basis | unknown |
| Span, mm | 1,050 |
| Chord, mm | — |
| Aspect ratio | 9.50 |
| Band | C3 Mid aspect |
| Brand files it under | Surf / carve |
| Disciplines | prone, wing, downwind, sup, wake, tow, kite |
| Construction | standard-modulus carbon |
| Model year | 2025-2026 |
| Source | manufacturer |
The brand's published aspect ratio agrees with its own span and area (span² ÷ area) to within 5%, so the figure is confirmed.
See KT Foiling on the plot →Data current to August 2026. Fast Bobby is the researcher, never the reviewer: every figure above is the manufacturer's published claim, converted to comparable units, and nothing here is a riding impression.