Unifoil Evolution 115 Evolution 115 hydrofoil front wing: 740 cm², 831 mm span, aspect ratio 9.30, with its closest equivalents from other brands within ±5% area and ±8% aspect ratio. Figures from Unifoil's own published specifications.
Projected and flat area run 3–8% apart. A marked area is one whose brand does not state which it publishes, so a match inside the area tolerance may be comparing unlike figures.
| Brand | Wing | Area cm² | Δ area | Aspect ratio | Δ AR | Span mm | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRD | Flying Fish Front Wing Y30 750 | 750 | +1.4% | 9.50 | +2.2% | 840 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Axis | Surge Surge 830 | 728 | -1.6% | 9.48 | +1.9% | 830 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Lift Foils | 120 Vario Beta Front Wing 120 | 744 | +0.5% | 9.60 | +3.2% | 864 | C4 High aspect |
| Axis | ART (AXIS Research Team) ART 799 | 730 | -1.4% | 9.05 | -2.7% | 799 | C3 Mid aspect |
| AFS | Silk V2 Front Wing Silk 750 | 750 | +1.4% | 9.00 | -3.2% | 821 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Code Foils | S Series Front Wing 720S | 720 | -2.7% | 9.50 | +2.2% | 830 | C3 Mid aspect |
| ENSIS | FLOW ACE Front Wing 720 | 720 | -2.7% | 9.50 | +2.2% | 827 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Sabfoil | Razor PRO 825 Razor PRO 825 | 746 | +0.8% | 8.84 | -4.9% | 820 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Slingshot | One-Lock Glide 725 | 725 | -2.0% | 8.90 | -4.3% | 799 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Takoon | Flash Front Wing 770 | 770 | +4.1% | 9.70 | +4.3% | 864 | C4 High aspect |
| GONG | Fluid V3 Atmo XS | 710 | -4.1% | 8.70 | -6.5% | 780 | C3 Mid aspect |
| Family | Evolution |
|---|---|
| Size | Evolution 115 |
| Area, cm² | 740 |
| Area basis | unknown |
| Span, mm | 831 |
| Chord, mm | 104 |
| Aspect ratio | 9.30 |
| Band | C3 Mid aspect |
| Brand files it under | Glide / high aspect |
| Disciplines | prone, wing, downwind, tow |
| Construction | HM carbon |
| Model year | 2026 |
| Source | manufacturer |
The brand's published aspect ratio agrees with its own span and area (span² ÷ area) to within 5%, so the figure is confirmed.
See Unifoil on the plot →Data current to August 2026. Fast Bobby is the researcher, never the reviewer: every figure above is the manufacturer's published claim, converted to comparable units, and nothing here is a riding impression.