Sabfoil Leviathan PRO 1160 Leviathan PRO 1160 hydrofoil front wing: 1,083 cm², 1,160 mm span, aspect ratio 12.42, with its closest equivalents from other brands within ±5% area and ±8% aspect ratio. Figures from Sabfoil's own published specifications.
Projected and flat area run 3–8% apart. A marked area is one whose brand does not state which it publishes, so a match inside the area tolerance may be comparing unlike figures.
| Brand | Wing | Area cm² | Δ area | Aspect ratio | Δ AR | Span mm | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Armstrong | UHA (Ultra High Aspect) UHA1070 | 1,070 | -1.2% | 12.60 | +1.4% | 1,161 | C5 Very high aspect |
| North | Sonar DW1100 DW1100 | 1,100 | +1.6% | 12.00 | -3.4% | 1,150 | C5 Very high aspect |
| GONG | Veloce Light Wind (LW) V3 Atmo L | 1,050 | -3.0% | 12.70 | +2.3% | 1,150 | C5 Very high aspect |
| Code Foils | R Series Front Wing 1075R | 1,075 | -0.7% | 13.00 | +4.7% | 1,180 | C5 Very high aspect |
| Axis | ART PRO ART PRO 1121 | 1,088 | +0.5% | 11.78 | -5.2% | 1,121 | C5 Very high aspect |
| Naish | SHA Foil Front Wing SHA 1133 | 1,133 | +4.6% | 12.71 | +2.3% | 1,200 | C5 Very high aspect |
| GONG | Veloce HDW V3 L | 1,050 | -3.0% | 13.30 | +7.1% | 1,180 | C5 Very high aspect |
| Takoon | Swell Front Wing 1050 | 1,050 | -3.0% | 11.50 | -7.4% | 1,100 | C4 High aspect |
| Unifoil | Quest 160 Quest 160 | 1,032 | -4.7% | 13.40 | +7.9% | 1,175 | C5 Very high aspect |
| Family | Leviathan PRO |
|---|---|
| Size | Leviathan PRO 1160 |
| Area, cm² | 1,083 |
| Area basis | unknown |
| Span, mm | 1,160 |
| Chord, mm | 115 |
| Aspect ratio | 12.42 |
| Band | C5 Very high aspect |
| Brand files it under | Downwind |
| Disciplines | wing, pump, sup, downwind |
| Construction | full carbon, no foam core |
| Model year | 2025-2026 |
| Source | manufacturer |
The brand's published aspect ratio agrees with its own span and area (span² ÷ area) to within 5%, so the figure is confirmed.
See Sabfoil on the plot →Data current to August 2026. Fast Bobby is the researcher, never the reviewer: every figure above is the manufacturer's published claim, converted to comparable units, and nothing here is a riding impression.