RRD Dynamic Pro Flying Fish Front Wing Y31 830
- 830area, cm²
- 940span, mm
- 10.65aspect ratio
- Highaspect · AR 9.5 – 11.5
Family DYNAMIC PRO FLYING FISH Brand’s category Downwind Disciplines downwind, wing, prone T800 and M40 carbon
Its 940 mm span is 6% wider than typical for the area — the median across the 130 current wings within 10% of its size is 889 mm.
Closest wings from other brands
Projected and flat area run 3–8% apart. A marked area is one whose brand does not state which it publishes, so a comparison inside the area tolerance may be comparing unlike figures.
| Brand | Wing | Area cm² | Δ area | Aspect ratio | Δ AR | Span mm | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFS | Enduro Front Wing 800 | 800 | -3.6% | 11.00 | +3.3% | 940 | High aspect |
| Slingshot | One-Lock Flow 800 | 800 | -3.6% | 11.00 | +3.3% | 937 | High aspect |
| Takoon | Flow Front Wing 800 | 800 | -3.6% | 10.70 | +0.5% | 920 | High aspect |
| North | Sonar HA850 | 850 | +2.4% | 10.00 | -6.1% | 920 | High aspect |
| Unifoil | Progression 125 | 806 | -2.9% | 10.00 | -6.1% | 898 | High aspect |
| Cabrinha | Fusion H-Series MkII H800 | 800 | -3.6% | 9.90 | -7.0% | 900 | High aspect |
| GONG | Hyper Trail V3 Atmo M | 850 | +2.4% | 11.40 | +7.0% | 980 | High aspect |
| Axis | ART v2 879 | 790 | -4.8% | 9.98 | -6.3% | 880 | High aspect |
| KT Foiling | Atlas 790 | 790 | -4.8% | 10.70 | +0.5% | 920 | High aspect |
| Levitaz | Front Wing FS 790 | 790 | -4.8% | 10.30 | -3.3% | 900 | High aspect |
| Naish | Jet HA Front Wing 840 | 840 | +1.2% | 9.80 | -8.0% | 900 | High aspect |
Specifications
| Family | DYNAMIC PRO FLYING FISH |
|---|---|
| Size | 830 |
| Area, cm² | 830 |
| Area basis | unknown |
| Span, mm | 940 |
| Chord, mm | — |
| Aspect ratio | 10.65 |
| Band | High aspect |
| Brand’s category | Downwind |
| Disciplines | downwind, wing, prone |
| Construction | T800 and M40 carbon |
| Model year | — |
| Source | manufacturer |
The brand's published aspect ratio contradicts its own span and area by more than 10%, so the geometric figure (span² ÷ area) is used instead, and the conflict is noted.
Data current to August 2026. Every figure above is the manufacturer's published claim, converted to comparable units.